Election Chaos Looms: Are Liberals Sabotaging Democracy with Incompetent Bureaucracy?

In a classic case of liberal bungling, the federal agency that guards our elections has made alarming shifts just before crucial midterms. They were set up in 2018 to thwart foreign threats, secure polling places, and handle emergencies like an Election Day bomb threat. But just when we need them to be rock solid, they’re painting a target on our democracy by scrambling their operations.

Let’s talk about priorities, folks. Instead of protecting the American vote, it seems like this agency is more concerned with showcasing its ability to “respond to disinformation campaigns.” Translation: they’d rather censor speech than secure voting booths. It’s the same old liberal playbook—limit free speech and call it safety. They’re so tangled up in policing thought that they forget the real battlefield is out there in cyberspace, not social media.

This shift in focus shows where their loyalties really lie. Clearly, appeasing globalist interests and feeling good about so-called ‘inclusivity’ ranks higher than ensuring secure elections for real American citizens. State and local officials are left to fend for themselves while federal dabblers pat themselves on the back for playing the disinfo hero. This is what you get when you trust liberals to organize a national defense strategy—the emperor is prancing around without clothes.

And who pays for this incompetence? We do, the American voters. Imagine waking up on Election Day, not worried about who will win, but if the vote will even count. This level of disorganization promises nothing but chaos when clarity is needed most. Why should we trust them with bigger issues when they can’t even keep the basics aligned?

The real question is, why do liberals put so much faith in unreliable bureaucracies? They gamble with the integrity of our elections for the sake of political optics. Are we supposed to just cross our fingers and hope they miraculously find competence before it’s too late?

Source: Washington Times


Posted

in

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *