Kamala Harris just backed the most out of touch candidate in Texas and voters are furious

Kamala Harris is back in the news, and once again, she’s proving the left never learns from their own disasters. You’d think after spectacularly crashing and burning as a presidential candidate, Harris would steer clear of meddling in important races. But no—now she’s sticking her nose into the Texas Senate primary, throwing her weight behind Jasmine Crockett. Yes, the same Jasmine Crockett who’s quickly making a name for herself as one of the most bafflingly out-of-touch candidates in recent memory.

It’s almost comical. Kamala, the poster child for political failure, is now pushing for someone who seems determined to follow in her footsteps. The Democrats love to talk about “making history,” but apparently they’re fine with making history for all the wrong reasons. Can you imagine the kind of policies a Harris–Crockett team would push? Higher taxes, open borders, and endless apologies for being American.

This is how the game is played on the left. When they’re not busy lecturing hardworking citizens about “equity” and climate change, they’re propping up their friends—no matter how unqualified. Just look at Harris’s track record: every project she touches turns into a spectacular mess. Now, she wants Texans to believe her judgment is worth trusting? Texans know better. They see right through this sham.

It’s almost insulting how Democrats keep handing each other golden tickets, hoping America won’t notice the utter incompetence hiding behind the slogans. While regular families struggle, elites in D.C. pick winners and losers in smoky back rooms. That’s not democracy—it’s pure corruption, and it’s time people call it out. Crockett is just the latest puppet for the same old failed agenda, and Kamala is the one pulling the strings.

If Kamala Harris thinks her endorsement means anything outside her tiny circle of yes-men, she’s dreaming. Maybe next time she should focus on fixing the border—her actual job—before telling Texans who should represent them. Or is failure the only thing Democrats truly excel at these days?

Source: Redstate