It’s astonishing, yet not surprising, that a group of former FDA leaders are coming together to slam current FDA vaccine safety claims. These so-called experts, appointed by both Republicans and Democrats, have leaped from the political shadows to attack their successor. It seems like a classic play from the liberal manual—pontificate about unity while dividing the nation with their alarmist rhetoric.
The current FDA leadership dares to question the safety of vaccines. Instead of applauding their commitment to our health, the establishment elite, who clearly have one foot in big government and the other in globalist interests, are throwing a hissy fit. This is typical of the bureaucratic swamp creatures who fear losing their power and influence. When someone new shakes up the status quo, they see it as a threat.
America deserves leaders who aren’t afraid to scrutinize and ask tough questions. Isn’t it their job to ensure we’re not blindly trusting anything, especially when it involves the health of our citizens? But no, the usual suspects want us to shut up and follow their lead without question. Their predictable outrage shows their true agenda: protect their legacy and maintain control, rather than fight for transparency and public safety.
The moderate voices within the FDA that dare to challenge the accepted narrative should be commended, not condemned. If the current vaccine chief raises valid concerns, why are these seasoned bureaucrats so rattled? It’s because deep down, they fear losing the grip of their failed policies that have been more about lip service than genuine improvement.
In a world where liberals claim to be the champions of science, why can’t we question and verify without reprisal? Could it be that the mighty are scared of what they might find? Or is it that they simply want to silence anyone who doesn’t toe the party line? Perhaps it’s time to ask who’s really pulling the strings over at the FDA. Who really benefits from silencing the voices of change?
Source: Washington Times
Leave a Reply