Swalwell gets exposed scrambling to hide China spy links after demanding Trump transparency

Eric Swalwell loves talking about transparency—just not when it comes to himself. He’s spent years demanding that every scrap of information from the Trump White House be dragged into the sunlight. His message was clear: if Trump has nothing to hide, then why not release everything? But now that transparency might put Swalwell in a tough spot, suddenly he’s singing a different tune.

This week, Swalwell is scrambling to hide files connected to Chinese espionage in America. Why? Because these documents tie him directly to a suspected Chinese spy. You read that right—a sitting U.S. Congressman got cozy with someone who had Beijing’s interests at heart. The same man who plays watchdog over American democracy doesn’t want the truth out when it comes to his own questionable friendships.

The double standard here is hard to ignore. When it was Trump, Epstein, or any conservative, Democrats demanded total exposure. Liberals told us secrets are only used to protect the guilty. But when it’s one of their own, they circle the wagons and scream about privacy and due process. They don’t care about national security or American interests—they just care about protecting their own skins.

Swalwell isn’t just some backbencher. He sits on important committees with access to sensitive information. If the rumors are true, he didn’t just turn a blind eye to Chinese infiltration, he welcomed it with open arms. And now he wants those files buried, calling it an invasion of his own privacy while being all too happy to invade everyone else’s.

The hypocrisy is absolutely rotten. Our country faces real threats from China, but elitists like Swalwell don’t want Americans knowing how deep this foreign meddling goes—especially when they get caught in the web. Maybe next time he wants to rant about “transparency,” voters should ask what he’s really trying to hide. Are liberals just protecting America, or are they just covering for each other—no matter the cost?

Source: Just The News


Posted

in

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *