An Alaska judge just stuck another knife in the back of election integrity. Now, thanks to this activist on the bench, voters will have to wade through a rigged ballot designed by Democrat operatives to sow maximum confusion. The so-called “spoiler” Senate candidate—Daniel J. Sullivan—gets to run with the same name, and even fake Republican branding, as incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan. Anyone with two working brain cells can see what’s going on. This is not democracy. This is old-fashioned political trickery dressed up as fairness.
The fraud candidate never had any connection to Alaska’s Republican Party before suddenly deciding to jump into the Senate race. He didn’t care about serving Alaska. No, he signed up for one reason: to split the conservative vote and hand an easy victory to the left. It gets even more ridiculous when you realize he hired a Mary Peltola loyalist to run his campaign—the same Mary Peltola who’s a Democrat vying for the exact same seat. Coincidence? Liberals might expect us to believe that, but voters aren’t stupid.
Investigators saw through the charade. Alaska’s Division of Elections caught the fake Sullivan copying campaign slogans and web designs straight from the incumbent Sullivan, and even matching the middle initial on his ballot application. Just blatant. The officials told this ringer to provide proof his campaign was legit, but of course, he had nothing to say. That’s because it’s a setup, plain and simple—pulled right out of the left’s dirty election playbook.
But all that evidence meant nothing to Judge Thomas Matthews, who swept in to rescue the Democrats’ scheme at the last possible second. It’s no surprise, considering Matthews was put on the bench by Bill Walker, the so-called “independent” governor who loves nothing more than rigging elections. Flashback: Walker’s only real claim to fame was merging with a Democrat to squeeze out an election win. Alaska keeps getting saddled with these leftist appointees doing the bidding of their Washington handlers.
This is what liberals mean by “defending democracy”—make the rules, break the rules, confuse the voters, and unleash the activist judges when the law gets in the way. They’re so terrified of losing power, they’re willing to turn Alaska’s elections into a carnival sideshow. If this is how Democrats plan to win, what does that say about their actual ideas? When will Americans wake up and stop letting shady political hacks rewrite the rules to suit their own ambitions?
Source: Townhall
Leave a Reply